Column: In support of more Wilderness |
|
|
|
| Written by Summit Daily News |
| Friday, October 16, 2009 |
|
Bryan Long Although I love all types of outdoor recreation (including ATV and snowmobile trips), I also understand the need to preserve some of the scant roadless areas that Colorado has left. Wilderness areas maintain biological diversity, improve air and water quality, and provide measurable economic benefits. That is why I support the Hidden Gems Wilderness proposal. While most of us are aware of the myriad reasons to preserve our public lands, many people are surprised to learn that Colorado is not as wild as we often perceive. In fact, the maximum core-to-perimeter distance in Colorado (the farthest one can get from a road) is only 8 miles! In California — a state with five times the population density of Colorado — the maximum core-to-perimeter distance is over 30 miles. In Idaho, it is 65 miles. With so many OHV (off-highway vehicle) users complaining about Wilderness denying their right to build more roads, you would imagine that Colorado had a lot more roadless lands. |
State by State Momentum
Community Voices
“We’ve had success bringing illegal riders to justice by snapping photos of their ID stickers. The problem in California is that they’re too darn small to see from far away or at high speeds. While I’m normally not in favor of the government getting involved in things, requiring all ORVs to have a visible ID with a minimum size and standard location would make them an even better tool for property owners to identify trespassing riders. We should also look to Wyoming’s lead and make trespassing penalties clear so riders think twice before they head off designated trails and onto my land.” - Mesonika Piecuch, private property owner, Kern County, CA |









